<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<title>Villanueva</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12766/1" rel="alternate"/>
<subtitle/>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12766/1</id>
<updated>2026-07-14T05:49:34Z</updated>
<dc:date>2026-07-14T05:49:34Z</dc:date>
<entry>
<title>Systematic bibliometric review of faith-based ethics in impact investing</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12766/896" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Infante, Juan</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12766/896</id>
<updated>2026-07-09T12:20:20Z</updated>
<published>2025-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Systematic bibliometric review of faith-based ethics in impact investing
Infante, Juan
The field of impact investing has grown significantly as a mechanism to align financial goals with ethical and social values. Within this context, religious principles play a critical role in shaping investment strategies. This study presents a systematic bibliometric review that examines the intersection between faith-based ethics and impact investing. It explores how religious tenets influence decision-making processes and approaches within socially responsible finance. By analyzing the existing academic literature, this research maps the field's landscape, identifies key themes, influential authors, and seminal works, and tracks its evolution over time. Ultimately, it reveals the mechanisms through which faith-based ethics shape and drive modern impact investing strategies.
</summary>
<dc:date>2025-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Your Silence Speaks Loudly: A ventriloquial approach to corporate silence about commitment in argumentative polylogues</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12766/895" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>López de Pedro, José María</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12766/895</id>
<updated>2026-06-11T02:00:14Z</updated>
<published>2026-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Your Silence Speaks Loudly: A ventriloquial approach to corporate silence about commitment in argumentative polylogues
López de Pedro, José María
Corporate social responsibility research often emphasizes the commissive effects of corporate discourse,ignoring silence or considering it a deliberate strategy to evade stakeholder pressure. From this perspective,only corporate discourse commits, and silence is the absence of discourse. This paper challenges thisapproach. Drawing on ventriloquial theory (Cooren, 2010) and the notion of metaventriloquism (Castor,2020), this paper develops the concept of corporate commissive silence (CCS) to theorize how corporatesilence on commitments operates as a malleable sign and a contested semiotic space. Specifically, it interpretsCCS as an absence of message that different agents identify, attribute to a company, and imbue withmeaning to promote their own opinions about what animates and/or should animate that company. As thisconcept highlights, not only words but also silence can generate commissive dynamics for corporations. Thecommunicative force of this type of silence does not depend on corporate intentionality, but rather on theoperations of appropriation and reinterpretation executed by other agents. To illustrate the utility of thisconcept, I describe several metaventriloquial practices executed by various agents in a recent controversysurrounding Disney’s silence on Florida’s HB 1557 law.
</summary>
<dc:date>2026-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Muscle failure and risk of adverse outcomes in older adults: a derivation and multicohort validation study</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12766/894" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Coelho-Junior, Helio José</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Álvarez Bustos, Alejandro</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Rodríguez-Sánchez, Isabel</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Landi, Francesco</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Marzetti, Emanuele</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12766/894</id>
<updated>2026-06-11T02:00:17Z</updated>
<published>2026-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Muscle failure and risk of adverse outcomes in older adults: a derivation and multicohort validation study
Coelho-Junior, Helio José; Álvarez Bustos, Alejandro; Rodríguez-Sánchez, Isabel; Landi, Francesco; Marzetti, Emanuele
Summary&#13;
Background&#13;
Sarcopenia is inconsistently defined, and its definition might not adequately capture muscle failure, underlying disability, and other adverse outcomes in older adults. We aimed to develop and validate an evidence-based, outcome-driven model of muscle failure.&#13;
Methods&#13;
In this derivation and multicohort validation study, we analysed data from the SPRINTT randomised controlled trial (1519 participants; mean age 78·9 years [SD 5·8]; 431 [28·4%] men, 1088 (71·6%) women) and validated findings in five independent cohorts (ilSIRENTE, NHANES, HRS, ELSA, and CHARLS). Neuromuscular domains including appendicular lean mass, muscle strength and power, mobility, and physical activity were assessed. Principal component analysis identified clusters of measures, which were tested for associations with disability in mobility and disability in activities of daily living, hospitalisation, and mortality using adjusted regression models. Predictive performance was evaluated with receiver operating characteristic curves. Area under the curve (AUC) values were defined as acceptable (0·7–0·8), excellent (0·8–0·9), or outstanding (&gt;0·9).&#13;
Findings&#13;
We identified two major muscle failure indexes: mobility (short-distance walking speed, 400 m walk) and physical activity (step counts, time spent standing, stepping, and sitting). In SPRINTT, the mobility model strongly predicted disability (AUC 0·721, 95% CI 0·698–0·795; p&lt;0·0001), whereas the physical activity model was more closely associated with hospitalisation (0·646, 0·570–0·731; p=0·00040) and mortality (0·746, 0·612–0·926; p=0·0020). Combined models including mobility, handgrip strength, appendicular lean mass, and absolute muscle power improved prediction of mortality (0·746, 0·549–0·955; p=0·0076). External validation confirmed acceptable-to-strong discrimination for disability outcomes across cohorts (AUCs 0·7–0·9), while associations with hospitalisation and mortality were weaker and inconsistent (0·4–0·9). Compared with consensus-based sarcopenia definitions, the evidence-based model seemed to show better predictive ability for disability.&#13;
Interpretation&#13;
Distinct mobility measures provide a robust framework for identifying muscle failure and predicting disability in older adults. Continuous activity monitoring might improve prediction of hospitalisation and mortality. This outcome-driven approach supports refinement of sarcopenia assessment and its implementation in clinical practice.
</summary>
<dc:date>2026-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Who decides? Intergenerational perception of adolescents' personal care products purchase and consumption.</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12766/893" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Irarrázaval, José</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Feijoó Fernández, Beatriz</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Negredo, Samuel</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12766/893</id>
<updated>2026-06-11T02:00:20Z</updated>
<published>2026-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Who decides? Intergenerational perception of adolescents' personal care products purchase and consumption.
Irarrázaval, José; Feijoó Fernández, Beatriz; Negredo, Samuel
This study explores intergenerational differences in theperception of adolescents' (ages 12–17) use of personalcare products and related purchasing decisions. An on-line survey of 1088 parent–child dyads (n = 2176) wasconducted, and paired samples t-tests were used. Resultsshow minors report higher usage—especially of gym andfitness items—than parents acknowledge. Adolescentsalso perceive more parental supervision than parents re-port. Parents set stricter age limits for purchasing itemslike makeup and supplements and express greater concernover risks. These findings reveal perception gaps that mayinform educational and regulatory approaches to adoles-cent consumption.
</summary>
<dc:date>2026-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
</feed>
